关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过海报

关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过

剧情片法国法语
9.04.4万℃ 点赞 2,346 1959年1小时50分钟更新 2024-04-09 04:13HD中字

导演居伊·德波

立即播放

播放列表

剧情简介

《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》讲述的是什么故事?

《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》Vo)^_-i$?`ce 1 (male pr?o``.f$e*^ ssional announcer type\:)( Th(#is neighborhood(]^^1@)) was mad:e f, .=or t?!he wretc!hed ?d)^+ignity$^ of the petty ! bou(/= rgeoisie, for r+ espectable $o=ccup !ation@s and intellectua/=]_l t?!ourism. The sedentary po:pu)]la:tion of th*?e upper floors wa$^s she ;lt(ered from t -he influences^? of the street. =._This nei%ghborhood. (=ha) @s rem ained-# th[ e same. It was /, the stra/__nge sett%+/ing ,:/of our ?`)$`story, where a sy#stema%t+ ic quest/:io((ning of /,@,all the diver $sions [and ^wo+rks of +$a so(!])ciety, *a tota$?l critique of` its id /,ea)+; $#of happiness, w((.a,s)[  expressed in acts.=   These people also scorned( sub#j:ect)\ive profu,:(n[dity* ^. They were interes::/ted in nothing; /bu)!t !:an adequat;@e a(:?nd $/;`concrete exp=%re-.ssi:// on o?f ]themselves.  _?Vo*.#ice 2  (@,#Debord, m ,on$]?:otone) Human bein=(gs are not fully consc!!ious of their# real li] fe - us`_-ually] grop^, ing /.:in the d !ark !; overwhel [med by t\he conseq%*uences \,of ;(th%/\,eir a\,ct,$\s; at  eve#ry\( mo ment=. groups /-]);and (@#.individua]ls fin#\d themselves confronte@d`_ with resu:+lts they have not wi \\*shed.  Voice 1 They said that oblivion) was their ruling /passion. They wanted to( r^einv ent ever#-ythi#ng (^!e%@(a?!c:*h day; to bec=o[!me the masters and possessors of their own live%.#,s.  Jus/)t as one /^does .?n @ot j=/@udge @[a man accor\/di^_ng to the c;*+onception he has of h)imsel-%f, on(  e cannot judge such periods of(. tr )ansit+ion! accordi_ng to t$heir *+own /consc+iousness; on t -+[he =contrary, o![ne must  explai-n ![-;the consc#%iousness throug(+h the c-`ontradictions of:?-(] m( aterial($ life, th^roug-h the conflict between %[social co?@nditions a?#nd the ]forces of s[+,o)=c ial%@ pr[\ -oducti$# on.  =*The progr`ess ,*achieved in_#@ the % dominati@on of nature$( ;was not ye(t match\=ed by@` a corr` $)espo nding lib +eration o,f .e*%#veryday/  life. Youth passed a/)way among the various c\+on)=trols of r:\esig+nati :?o)`n.  Our camera has captured =:;for you a fe.=w a-sp_ect]!s of a pr^/o$]visio +\,.na l mic.roso[#cie)ty.  The knowled!)$g!e of !+)empiri=[cal / facts @em :a)ins a_#bstract and superf\@icial a)s lo* .ng as i)!(?t is not?_ concr*etized b !y] `*its* integrat @=-ion i(-nto*$+ the whol ;e ” =which /=alone per`mit^$?s the.-* sup@/,erse ss[,ion of par#_tial and abstr^-a*c[_t % prob`lem**s(+) so as to a-rrive a].t their concre?)te ess+e@nce, and i!mplici]t@!ly[ at[ th eir me(+(ani@ng.  This .:grou:p was on the margins of t@_he eco !nomy. It tended toward a ,%role of pure con\!]]sumptio@n;, and first/ of_ all the free consump[tio?n of $it_s time. It thus +fo.-un,^*d itself di-rectly en#gage=d in ?%qualita/tive variations o  ^f everyday life but depr(*ived of !any m/eans to i - $nter_%^-v(=ene in -them.$  The). group ra- nged over a ve%) ry sma#ll area. The same times brought them back to the:/ same places. No /^one wen\][t to ^bed early. !Di$s);=cussion on the mean!@ing  of all this continued.._).  Voice 2 Our life is a journ^ey ” In the winter a_n/d the night. ”_.^ We seek our pa]@s[sage...�  ;= Vo@?i%/ ce 1 The abandoned literature!@ !(nevertheless exe,@(rted a d%elayin\g acti:o=,n ;on \new af= fec(*.;tive formulat``^i^/ons.  Voice 2 Ther*[e was the# )\f[*a`tigue # and t/he cold of the morn+,`ing in this much-tr%(*[av.$ersed l!)*abyr[int*-^%h, like an enigma +]]@that we had];? to resolve. It w as a looking-gl\ ass reality through which)# we had t(![o dis_.cover the potent ial richne.ss $ o!f re^al-ity.  On^$ @ t .he) ?b()ank of the rive+ r evening began once aga]-`in; /and car_?-ess`=es?  ; and the im-`;.*por;t%ance of  a *;worl! d w + ith_o#^#ut im-.port ance.-;@ Just as the =[eyes have a blurred vision of= many th;i(!]ngs a] )nd can /^see ]*onl!#y on=e- #!@clearly, so. the $w?ill ; can st/rive onl#,y incomple._tely towar$)[`d diverse objects and/: can _,[completel$y (love)= only o@n\ e at a ti$me.  Voi/ce 3 (youn\(g gi ?!r(/l) No on=e counted on the? future#). It?_ wo \u`\ld never be possible t` o be toget!her later, %;o/%r anywhere el*_se. T$%her/.)e woul?(d never be a; g $?re ^-:ater freedom,.  Voice 1 The ref _,usal of[ time and of growing old ``au/,tomatic]=a .^lly@*, limited , e(,nco=u.`(nters in ]this)#*  narrow, co)+%ntingent zo=^-ne, where wha:@t was l*acki_ng *]:was fel_t )as ir;!?,reparable. !(Th;?@,e extreme preca[!)ri.ousness o^;f the @m.ea[ns$:$ of getting /by witho (:ut +(working w;@as at%+ +the` root of -)this# imp) atien!c?e wh=%ich m%ade e@%x_cesses necess/ary a(\#nd breaks definitive. $` Voice 2 One never really contests an o:rganization ^.!of ex?$i `s-tence witho$ut con!test]*i]_/ng all of t+hat organiz:ation's (^forms of l_^anguag/e.  #`Voic e 1 Whe] @n /_ freedom is p[)ractic\*ed in a closed circ(le#.., it fades into%@ a dream, becomes a mere repre:sentation of* itself. The) ambianc*+e [, o $=f play \_is_ by nat- ure un /stable. At any moment or!din!*%!ary=, li][fe,?^� can prev@(ai]l on `ce aga@(in. +The geographica^-l+] li/mit ati(on of play i ;s even m)ore strik/)ing than its t?emporal /?%$l@,)imitation. Any ga?m[(e takes pla c+ e with=in /+th )e c\ontou@rs of its s-.!pati^al domai+n.  Ar]?ou!^nd the neighborhood, ;*]#ar]ound its fle.\et%^ing and* thr$!eatene (d immobility, stre.-tched \a h^alf-know.*n ci-(ty where pe =opl.e me[t only@ -+by ch;ance, losin g t=:h![eir way #forev_er..  The girls who; #fo[[un`_d their way there, beca#/$^use they were legally und@#er t% he [control o:%-f thei $@r %fam `ilies until (the- ! ,=-=age :of eight+#ee_]n, we@ r$e oft#_en-) recap+ t*$ured by the \ defen $de_@rs of th% at detestabl +.e i;nstitu/%]tion. T=hey $/wer#e generally confined u,nder the guard`/; of those, c?rea tures wh/o among all t%/he bad . ]products of a b ad s%+ociety are th@?e most ugly and repugna]^nt) ` nuns.  What+ usually makes d?)oc [/u=-^,mentari? es so easy.)) to understand is the arbitrary l];imitat(-ion,  of their subjec* =t matter. -%(They de?scribe the atomizat/io=n# of so$c:%]$ial f]unctions @!.!and the (iso[*la#;tion of their products. One can, !:in] contrast, e_#nvisa.%ge t,= h%/e.\ entire complexity .*-of a :-!mom]%[ent whic*)h*(@ is not resolved into a wo/%]r%.*k+, a moment whose( m*:ove / *ment [)ind@issolub^/ly cont!ains f+a_ c!ts a;nd :-value`#+s and who@ se mean.ing does] not yet,_ appe];ar. The $:\subje;] ct\ matter? of[ *the -`document]ary wou;l ._d then be this+ confused totality.  #Vo [ice (2 The era had arrived at a level of  ..kno(-.(w=\ledge and technical mea ns $)th at mad(e possi+ ble, and increasin?gly (necessa+)ry, a @direc=t construction of_.* all) ; aspects of a libe@r/ated `;affective -,and ;practical exis)tence. The appearan =#ce of these superior me^ans ?of act+.ion,  [[still unused?_ bec,ause of the delay,\s in the ^%project of )_liquidating the c*ommodity econ?omy,_: had a[;lready cond!) emned aest]`heti+c ac[[tivity, wh .!ose ambitions %and powers w%;+e,re both -,outdated*/$. The*  decay of art and o f_ all the v`alues o=f fo$=rmer mores ha`+,d formed our s.ocio lo]gical backgro,u ` nd. The ruli,;(ng class's ;?m%onopoly over t_-he .ins($\t(ruments we neede`;d to control in o+^)rder to reali\]ze)]* t^he coll.*;ective @/ar?#t of our ,@*time :had e?\\xclude- +d us from a cultur;al (^(]production o*.).ffici!all %y\+# devo.:`ted to illust;`ratin.g and r-\epeati\.^ng the past. An art film on this $]generation ca;#n! only [*be a ;film@ * on its[ % absence o@ f real creations.  E; veryo],ne unthin[kingly fo^ll%owed the *]paths lea]=r \n[e($d once and for all, to th),eir work a@nd their;\: home, to the . *ir :=predic` !table future!)]. Fo[r[!$ them duty had already becom,e a habi=]t,  %;an d habit a-/ du )ty. Th$#ey d(i%@)d % not se$%!e the: defic-\iency of t%:heir city_(. They though*:+t the de ficiency #of* thei@r l[\ife was natural. We want]e*$ d t`o)#_ break;.; out of this con[-dit_`=ion=*ing, in que- st of;   (another use of the urban lands$,# #cape, in qu- est o!.f new passio+)ns. The atmosphere; of a few pla[( $ ce [s gave us intimations o=:-^,f the!@# future p/$owers =. of ?a/`n architectur%?e it w. oul==d be nece-,ssary to cre_%%ate to b\#(e  th-e(+ support and frame_?w^;* [ork for less_ [  mediocre gam) ._es.  We co:uld expect noth]in,g* of anyth[ ,ing we.] had not ou\rsel= v?es alt^ )!^er/ ^ed. The urban envir/o(nment proclaimed the order s and tastes )`of the rulin+;:[g s(ociet?y, just as violent.ly as +%the% n!ewsp^a@!*pers. It is m:an  who m@/akes t)he unity o_ f the world, but* man ha$-s- e/\xtended himsel,^]f everywhere.` People ca n \ see no?thi)ng aro:=und @them tha!(t is not thei ..r own image; everything speaks %[to them of t_h+@emselves. Their [very la[n?!ds^+cape is aliv/e._$ @ There were[ obstac-,les+ everywhe/*]re. There was a ^%cohesion +?:in the obstacl[-es!- of all types. T#! h;ey= mai.$ntained t*!he cohe;@):re@/^!nt reign of po==,v /(erty. Ev!(*erything.# #\/]being con =:`nect^$ed, it was necessary t+-^o :^]!change e@[very*^/thin=@g _?by a] unitary stru-;ggle, .or! nothing. \+#It was nec +essary to //link up with t][/h]e  masses,#;* but we ^we:\#re sur;@rou)nde]?d b$^/y sl.;eep.  V`-oice 3 _The / d@ ictatorsh:ip of th?!e +#;pro_le taria, t /i%s a desperate struggle, $_blo,;=ody and bl,oodless\[, violent and peacefu !.l, m``ilitary and ec onomic, ed\ucat ional and / ;;admini* strative, a?gai-%%n,st the forces ?-an+d t!@radit.*$ions `#of the `o_l !d. wo-^ rl@d.,_  Vo@ /ic/,%#e 1 In this,; country it  @$is on*!ce @a-gain the men of order who h;//ave reb=#+ell\_ed. They have?^ rein`forced their pow\?:/er@. They ha _ ve been@_ [ a;)[ble to aggravate the=: g!+()r[/o! \tesqueness of the ruli#ng /-=!conditions )-+according to their will. The_.y have embel_lished., their system with the fu#_nere]al c+er=$emonie?:s of the past.  Voice 2 Years,/+ like a sing/ le in*stant prolonged to ) this p[o;int,[[= come to an e/ nd.  Voice 1 What was direc_ tl@y lived reappears+ @(frozen in the  dista=#nce, ;^.fit into the tastes$ and illu/$_?sions of ]an era, carried = %#away $`!with:+ it.  ;:_Voi ce 2 The\_ appearance of ev:en##ts that we have (,not ma,%de- , that =?)oth\.;ers ha#ve ma@de again!/st us *, #now(?\ ob. +liges us  to be aware of the passage of ^]time, its$ re@(sults, t)he transformat+%ion of *;:our ` own desi`res_ int?]o events. What diffe!=`rent%^iat@)%e s th ^e past from the]$ p[@;resent is precisely it,s out-of-reac +h\/ objec#)t@i(vit +y; the)r.e is no more $should-be; being@ is +so co nsum\ed tha t it has ceased to exist. The details are already +%lo/*st in the dust of time. Who .\was afraid of life+^^, afraid\ ]+of the night, (,afraid =o,[f being?# taken, afraid of being kept @ Voice 3 Wh[_at shoul[d ; be , `abo.lis$hed continues, an^d w)-e contin ue t_o: w[ear aw;ay with %.it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The /ye; #ars  `)pass(# and we$= haven't change*,d a]+nyth?+ing.  Voice 2 On=ce ,again (.; ,m` orning in the same streets.  On:_ce*? a?_gain the! fatigue of*. =-so@ many simi-:larly , pa %s%sed nig#_h@ +!t s. It`+. is %a w+alk[  that/, h%\as  ^lasted a_ @long time`. (+ Voice #!1 Really hard to. d-_rink more.  Voice+ 2 Of course$= one might make,] a_?%? f_-ilm of it. + But even if s- ^uch a film su]cc: (eeds in being as%*?` fu`$nda! [ment ally disconnected^ and un[satisfying as (th#e real *it_y%;\ it dea\:ls with, it will never*\^ be]% more t_,han a re*?-; creation ” po?!or and \f!`alse @\l/_ike this botch!ed traveli@n!^g:\ shot.  Voice @_3 ,./There are now people\#* wh+ `o ^pride t #hemselve)=@s/ o n/- b:!(e`\ing authors of films/*+, as, ,others were authors _o!f novels. They a\[+re (=even mo$] re %]backward ./tha(n th.e novelist# s because ;@they are unaware o _ f ^ +th%#e .(decomp!-osition and exhau!stion of *?ind ividua:l ex\:_pressi^!on in our tim^*e/, ign#]ora%;nt of the( end of the arts of /pass/ivi =ty.^ They are = prai se)#d for t)heir si ,n\-`cerit(y sinc$e `:` they dramatize, with#,+; more per?sonal de pth, the convention@s of% which their life consist-.s@ \. Th  ere is tal=-(^k; of: the .;lib  eration of the cinema. But what does it _)matter t;#\ o us if one mor(%e art is ))liberat[`-ed th +rough which Tom, Dick or Harr_y ca[n joyously ex,`pr=( ess the.i/,r slavish (/s* entiment!\ $s The on\%ly int)ere)sting vent =ure is the l.\.iberation of ^ ;#)everyday life, not* only/_ in th \*e p??\?_erspectives #/o# %f /$h!% istory but f$or us a=nd righ$[[t away. T/$+!his en![tails =th)##@e #!.--withering away of alienated forms of communica..t`ion(. The cin,-e-ma, to^!o, @\;has to \be d?estroyed.  V oice 2 In t[he#@ final analys,=(is,] stars are created by t?%-he need we have for them, and n+ot by, their talen:t or lack of talen  t or even );%by the_ !fi(^lm i,ndust;.ry or advertising. ^#Miserable nee!%d, dismal,/@] anonymo@us life tha. t @  would like to ex-@pa-\_ nd i]  tse lf to the dime+nsions# of/\ cine ma li*f #]e. The %;imagi *nary life on the screen)# ^ is- the pro;;duct o+f this real need. The star is t\*;he pro je[ction of this nee d. #( The im%ages of  the adve[r+tisem[`?]ent@s, dur*]ing the in;termission/s are mo- re^ su;+ited ,$ than -*%any others  =_for evoking an in=termission of, l%ife.  To %/really d esc`/ribe this *era it woul]** d no doubt be necessary t__@ o show many other[ things. But what would *be the po/i^nt  Better to grasp the totality o=f what has been done and what re*+main=s= to be d-^!one than to *@add more ruins to t(,)he old world o^f%  ??the )spectacle #and ^of memories+% .?   #@1. This film, :#^!whic`=h ev$)[okes the lettrist e*[_xperienc!e\:#s at)^)= the^(, o/rigin of the situationist moveme))nt, _`opens with shots of the Paris [ district frequ+ ented by the lettrists in the e*arly,) 1950s.

一、《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》是哪一年上映的?

《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》是居伊·德波于1959年拍摄的一部经典剧情片。此片开创法国当代剧情片的先河,《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》上映时票房稳坐前三,创下当年纪录。当时均为最佳主角,以精彩演技和突出形象,奠定在法国影坛地位。饰演角色造型多年后仍为人所模仿。居伊·德波之前曾被人怀疑其能力,而《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》却奠定居伊·德波剧情片风格。《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》首映时曾获海外剧情片和媒体广泛称誉,被认为其优秀程度,是足以与同时期(指1959年代)法国(法国)优秀剧情片齐名。

二、被称为剧情片的开先河之作的《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》,是居伊·德波最好的作品吗?

从居伊·德波斩获剧情片最佳导演 我就觉得这部《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》是他最好的剧情片。虽然居伊·德波后来还拍出来了评价特别好的剧情片,但是《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》是他剧情片的代表作品。

三、《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》为什么可以成为经典?

提起法国,人们就肯定会说出《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》的名字。这部由居伊·德波导演,主演的《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》,在当时,真的是成为了一匹黑马,杀出了一条血路,创造了一个奇迹。为何会这么说,我想,就连居伊·德波导演和,都没想到这部剧情片会得到这样好的反响。居伊·德波先生曾说过,这是一群失意的人凑到了一起创作出来的一部作品。因为在《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》开拍之前,已经有几年年无戏可拍,而主演的剧情片,票房始终不理想,这样的几个人凑在了一起,也真是缘分!所以,正是这样的失意感和强烈的自尊心,他们在剧情片中投入的热情,是我们难以想象的,其实《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》中的人物心理历程和感人的剧情,何尝不是现实中他们的真实写照呢?所以,他们怀着一腔心有不甘的英雄气,用他们的实力和人情成就了这部经典剧情片,也成就了他们自己!

四、如何评价《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》?

《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》口碑非常好深受广大观众喜爱,《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》一经播放立刻引来无数人点赞,不仅演的好而且该剧情片故事情节也非常紧凑,星空影院(msdts.com)观看起来特别流畅同时还能扣人心弦,虽然目前《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》收视率一般但是该片目前受欢迎程度已经名列前茅。该剧情片主演,她在该剧情片中的演技可圈可点,受到演的好而且该剧情片迷的认可。

五、《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》剧情片的主要内容

《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》是一部剧情片剧情片,由导演:居伊·德波执导,主演:

《关于在?:短时+/\)间内的某几个人的经过》Vo)^_-i$?`ce 1 (male pr?o``.f$e*^ ssional announcer type\:)( Th(#is neighborhood(]^^1@)) was mad:e f, .=or t?!he wretc!hed ?d)^+ignity$^ of the petty ! bou(/= rgeoisie, for r+ espectable $o=ccup !ation@s and intellectua/=]_l t?!ourism. The sedentary po:pu)]la:tion of th*?e upper floors wa$^s she ;lt(ered from t -he influences^? of the street. =._This nei%ghborhood. (=ha) @s rem ained-# th[ e same. It was /, the stra/__nge sett%+/ing ,:/of our ?`)$`story, where a sy#stema%t+ ic quest/:io((ning of /,@,all the diver $sions [and ^wo+rks of +$a so(!])ciety, *a tota$?l critique of` its id /,ea)+; $#of happiness, w((.a,s)[  expressed in acts.=   These people also scorned( sub#j:ect)\ive profu,:(n[dity* ^. They were interes::/ted in nothing; /bu)!t !:an adequat;@e a(:?nd $/;`concrete exp=%re-.ssi:// on o?f ]themselves.  _?Vo*.#ice 2  (@,#Debord, m ,on$]?:otone) Human bein=(gs are not fully consc!!ious of their# real li] fe - us`_-ually] grop^, ing /.:in the d !ark !; overwhel [med by t\he conseq%*uences \,of ;(th%/\,eir a\,ct,$\s; at  eve#ry\( mo ment=. groups /-]);and (@#.individua]ls fin#\d themselves confronte@d`_ with resu:+lts they have not wi \\*shed.  Voice 1 They said that oblivion) was their ruling /passion. They wanted to( r^einv ent ever#-ythi#ng (^!e%@(a?!c:*h day; to bec=o[!me the masters and possessors of their own live%.#,s.  Jus/)t as one /^does .?n @ot j=/@udge @[a man accor\/di^_ng to the c;*+onception he has of h)imsel-%f, on(  e cannot judge such periods of(. tr )ansit+ion! accordi_ng to t$heir *+own /consc+iousness; on t -+[he =contrary, o![ne must  explai-n ![-;the consc#%iousness throug(+h the c-`ontradictions of:?-(] m( aterial($ life, th^roug-h the conflict between %[social co?@nditions a?#nd the ]forces of s[+,o)=c ial%@ pr[\ -oducti$# on.  =*The progr`ess ,*achieved in_#@ the % dominati@on of nature$( ;was not ye(t match\=ed by@` a corr` $)espo nding lib +eration o,f .e*%#veryday/  life. Youth passed a/)way among the various c\+on)=trols of r:\esig+nati :?o)`n.  Our camera has captured =:;for you a fe.=w a-sp_ect]!s of a pr^/o$]visio +\,.na l mic.roso[#cie)ty.  The knowled!)$g!e of !+)empiri=[cal / facts @em :a)ins a_#bstract and superf\@icial a)s lo* .ng as i)!(?t is not?_ concr*etized b !y] `*its* integrat @=-ion i(-nto*$+ the whol ;e ” =which /=alone per`mit^$?s the.-* sup@/,erse ss[,ion of par#_tial and abstr^-a*c[_t % prob`lem**s(+) so as to a-rrive a].t their concre?)te ess+e@nce, and i!mplici]t@!ly[ at[ th eir me(+(ani@ng.  This .:grou:p was on the margins of t@_he eco !nomy. It tended toward a ,%role of pure con\!]]sumptio@n;, and first/ of_ all the free consump[tio?n of $it_s time. It thus +fo.-un,^*d itself di-rectly en#gage=d in ?%qualita/tive variations o  ^f everyday life but depr(*ived of !any m/eans to i - $nter_%^-v(=ene in -them.$  The). group ra- nged over a ve%) ry sma#ll area. The same times brought them back to the:/ same places. No /^one wen\][t to ^bed early. !Di$s);=cussion on the mean!@ing  of all this continued.._).  Voice 2 Our life is a journ^ey ” In the winter a_n/d the night. ”_.^ We seek our pa]@s[sage...�  ;= Vo@?i%/ ce 1 The abandoned literature!@ !(nevertheless exe,@(rted a d%elayin\g acti:o=,n ;on \new af= fec(*.;tive formulat``^i^/ons.  Voice 2 Ther*[e was the# )\f[*a`tigue # and t/he cold of the morn+,`ing in this much-tr%(*[av.$ersed l!)*abyr[int*-^%h, like an enigma +]]@that we had];? to resolve. It w as a looking-gl\ ass reality through which)# we had t(![o dis_.cover the potent ial richne.ss $ o!f re^al-ity.  On^$ @ t .he) ?b()ank of the rive+ r evening began once aga]-`in; /and car_?-ess`=es?  ; and the im-`;.*por;t%ance of  a *;worl! d w + ith_o#^#ut im-.port ance.-;@ Just as the =[eyes have a blurred vision of= many th;i(!]ngs a] )nd can /^see ]*onl!#y on=e- #!@clearly, so. the $w?ill ; can st/rive onl#,y incomple._tely towar$)[`d diverse objects and/: can _,[completel$y (love)= only o@n\ e at a ti$me.  Voi/ce 3 (youn\(g gi ?!r(/l) No on=e counted on the? future#). It?_ wo \u`\ld never be possible t` o be toget!her later, %;o/%r anywhere el*_se. T$%her/.)e woul?(d never be a; g $?re ^-:ater freedom,.  Voice 1 The ref _,usal of[ time and of growing old ``au/,tomatic]=a .^lly@*, limited , e(,nco=u.`(nters in ]this)#*  narrow, co)+%ntingent zo=^-ne, where wha:@t was l*acki_ng *]:was fel_t )as ir;!?,reparable. !(Th;?@,e extreme preca[!)ri.ousness o^;f the @m.ea[ns$:$ of getting /by witho (:ut +(working w;@as at%+ +the` root of -)this# imp) atien!c?e wh=%ich m%ade e@%x_cesses necess/ary a(\#nd breaks definitive. $` Voice 2 One never really contests an o:rganization ^.!of ex?$i `s-tence witho$ut con!test]*i]_/ng all of t+hat organiz:ation's (^forms of l_^anguag/e.  #`Voic e 1 Whe] @n /_ freedom is p[)ractic\*ed in a closed circ(le#.., it fades into%@ a dream, becomes a mere repre:sentation of* itself. The) ambianc*+e [, o $=f play \_is_ by nat- ure un /stable. At any moment or!din!*%!ary=, li][fe,?^� can prev@(ai]l on `ce aga@(in. +The geographica^-l+] li/mit ati(on of play i ;s even m)ore strik/)ing than its t?emporal /?%$l@,)imitation. Any ga?m[(e takes pla c+ e with=in /+th )e c\ontou@rs of its s-.!pati^al domai+n.  Ar]?ou!^nd the neighborhood, ;*]#ar]ound its fle.\et%^ing and* thr$!eatene (d immobility, stre.-tched \a h^alf-know.*n ci-(ty where pe =opl.e me[t only@ -+by ch;ance, losin g t=:h![eir way #forev_er..  The girls who; #fo[[un`_d their way there, beca#/$^use they were legally und@#er t% he [control o:%-f thei $@r %fam `ilies until (the- ! ,=-=age :of eight+#ee_]n, we@ r$e oft#_en-) recap+ t*$ured by the \ defen $de_@rs of th% at detestabl +.e i;nstitu/%]tion. T=hey $/wer#e generally confined u,nder the guard`/; of those, c?rea tures wh/o among all t%/he bad . ]products of a b ad s%+ociety are th@?e most ugly and repugna]^nt) ` nuns.  What+ usually makes d?)oc [/u=-^,mentari? es so easy.)) to understand is the arbitrary l];imitat(-ion,  of their subjec* =t matter. -%(They de?scribe the atomizat/io=n# of so$c:%]$ial f]unctions @!.!and the (iso[*la#;tion of their products. One can, !:in] contrast, e_#nvisa.%ge t,= h%/e.\ entire complexity .*-of a :-!mom]%[ent whic*)h*(@ is not resolved into a wo/%]r%.*k+, a moment whose( m*:ove / *ment [)ind@issolub^/ly cont!ains f+a_ c!ts a;nd :-value`#+s and who@ se mean.ing does] not yet,_ appe];ar. The $:\subje;] ct\ matter? of[ *the -`document]ary wou;l ._d then be this+ confused totality.  #Vo [ice (2 The era had arrived at a level of  ..kno(-.(w=\ledge and technical mea ns $)th at mad(e possi+ ble, and increasin?gly (necessa+)ry, a @direc=t construction of_.* all) ; aspects of a libe@r/ated `;affective -,and ;practical exis)tence. The appearan =#ce of these superior me^ans ?of act+.ion,  [[still unused?_ bec,ause of the delay,\s in the ^%project of )_liquidating the c*ommodity econ?omy,_: had a[;lready cond!) emned aest]`heti+c ac[[tivity, wh .!ose ambitions %and powers w%;+e,re both -,outdated*/$. The*  decay of art and o f_ all the v`alues o=f fo$=rmer mores ha`+,d formed our s.ocio lo]gical backgro,u ` nd. The ruli,;(ng class's ;?m%onopoly over t_-he .ins($\t(ruments we neede`;d to control in o+^)rder to reali\]ze)]* t^he coll.*;ective @/ar?#t of our ,@*time :had e?\\xclude- +d us from a cultur;al (^(]production o*.).ffici!all %y\+# devo.:`ted to illust;`ratin.g and r-\epeati\.^ng the past. An art film on this $]generation ca;#n! only [*be a ;film@ * on its[ % absence o@ f real creations.  E; veryo],ne unthin[kingly fo^ll%owed the *]paths lea]=r \n[e($d once and for all, to th),eir work a@nd their;\: home, to the . *ir :=predic` !table future!)]. Fo[r[!$ them duty had already becom,e a habi=]t,  %;an d habit a-/ du )ty. Th$#ey d(i%@)d % not se$%!e the: defic-\iency of t%:heir city_(. They though*:+t the de ficiency #of* thei@r l[\ife was natural. We want]e*$ d t`o)#_ break;.; out of this con[-dit_`=ion=*ing, in que- st of;   (another use of the urban lands$,# #cape, in qu- est o!.f new passio+)ns. The atmosphere; of a few pla[( $ ce [s gave us intimations o=:-^,f the!@# future p/$owers =. of ?a/`n architectur%?e it w. oul==d be nece-,ssary to cre_%%ate to b\#(e  th-e(+ support and frame_?w^;* [ork for less_ [  mediocre gam) ._es.  We co:uld expect noth]in,g* of anyth[ ,ing we.] had not ou\rsel= v?es alt^ )!^er/ ^ed. The urban envir/o(nment proclaimed the order s and tastes )`of the rulin+;:[g s(ociet?y, just as violent.ly as +%the% n!ewsp^a@!*pers. It is m:an  who m@/akes t)he unity o_ f the world, but* man ha$-s- e/\xtended himsel,^]f everywhere.` People ca n \ see no?thi)ng aro:=und @them tha!(t is not thei ..r own image; everything speaks %[to them of t_h+@emselves. Their [very la[n?!ds^+cape is aliv/e._$ @ There were[ obstac-,les+ everywhe/*]re. There was a ^%cohesion +?:in the obstacl[-es!- of all types. T#! h;ey= mai.$ntained t*!he cohe;@):re@/^!nt reign of po==,v /(erty. Ev!(*erything.# #\/]being con =:`nect^$ed, it was necessary t+-^o :^]!change e@[very*^/thin=@g _?by a] unitary stru-;ggle, .or! nothing. \+#It was nec +essary to //link up with t][/h]e  masses,#;* but we ^we:\#re sur;@rou)nde]?d b$^/y sl.;eep.  V`-oice 3 _The / d@ ictatorsh:ip of th?!e +#;pro_le taria, t /i%s a desperate struggle, $_blo,;=ody and bl,oodless\[, violent and peacefu !.l, m``ilitary and ec onomic, ed\ucat ional and / ;;admini* strative, a?gai-%%n,st the forces ?-an+d t!@radit.*$ions `#of the `o_l !d. wo-^ rl@d.,_  Vo@ /ic/,%#e 1 In this,; country it  @$is on*!ce @a-gain the men of order who h;//ave reb=#+ell\_ed. They have?^ rein`forced their pow\?:/er@. They ha _ ve been@_ [ a;)[ble to aggravate the=: g!+()r[/o! \tesqueness of the ruli#ng /-=!conditions )-+according to their will. The_.y have embel_lished., their system with the fu#_nere]al c+er=$emonie?:s of the past.  Voice 2 Years,/+ like a sing/ le in*stant prolonged to ) this p[o;int,[[= come to an e/ nd.  Voice 1 What was direc_ tl@y lived reappears+ @(frozen in the  dista=#nce, ;^.fit into the tastes$ and illu/$_?sions of ]an era, carried = %#away $`!with:+ it.  ;:_Voi ce 2 The\_ appearance of ev:en##ts that we have (,not ma,%de- , that =?)oth\.;ers ha#ve ma@de again!/st us *, #now(?\ ob. +liges us  to be aware of the passage of ^]time, its$ re@(sults, t)he transformat+%ion of *;:our ` own desi`res_ int?]o events. What diffe!=`rent%^iat@)%e s th ^e past from the]$ p[@;resent is precisely it,s out-of-reac +h\/ objec#)t@i(vit +y; the)r.e is no more $should-be; being@ is +so co nsum\ed tha t it has ceased to exist. The details are already +%lo/*st in the dust of time. Who .\was afraid of life+^^, afraid\ ]+of the night, (,afraid =o,[f being?# taken, afraid of being kept @ Voice 3 Wh[_at shoul[d ; be , `abo.lis$hed continues, an^d w)-e contin ue t_o: w[ear aw;ay with %.it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The /ye; #ars  `)pass(# and we$= haven't change*,d a]+nyth?+ing.  Voice 2 On=ce ,again (.; ,m` orning in the same streets.  On:_ce*? a?_gain the! fatigue of*. =-so@ many simi-:larly , pa %s%sed nig#_h@ +!t s. It`+. is %a w+alk[  that/, h%\as  ^lasted a_ @long time`. (+ Voice #!1 Really hard to. d-_rink more.  Voice+ 2 Of course$= one might make,] a_?%? f_-ilm of it. + But even if s- ^uch a film su]cc: (eeds in being as%*?` fu`$nda! [ment ally disconnected^ and un[satisfying as (th#e real *it_y%;\ it dea\:ls with, it will never*\^ be]% more t_,han a re*?-; creation ” po?!or and \f!`alse @\l/_ike this botch!ed traveli@n!^g:\ shot.  Voice @_3 ,./There are now people\#* wh+ `o ^pride t #hemselve)=@s/ o n/- b:!(e`\ing authors of films/*+, as, ,others were authors _o!f novels. They a\[+re (=even mo$] re %]backward ./tha(n th.e novelist# s because ;@they are unaware o _ f ^ +th%#e .(decomp!-osition and exhau!stion of *?ind ividua:l ex\:_pressi^!on in our tim^*e/, ign#]ora%;nt of the( end of the arts of /pass/ivi =ty.^ They are = prai se)#d for t)heir si ,n\-`cerit(y sinc$e `:` they dramatize, with#,+; more per?sonal de pth, the convention@s of% which their life consist-.s@ \. Th  ere is tal=-(^k; of: the .;lib  eration of the cinema. But what does it _)matter t;#\ o us if one mor(%e art is ))liberat[`-ed th +rough which Tom, Dick or Harr_y ca[n joyously ex,`pr=( ess the.i/,r slavish (/s* entiment!\ $s The on\%ly int)ere)sting vent =ure is the l.\.iberation of ^ ;#)everyday life, not* only/_ in th \*e p??\?_erspectives #/o# %f /$h!% istory but f$or us a=nd righ$[[t away. T/$+!his en![tails =th)##@e #!.--withering away of alienated forms of communica..t`ion(. The cin,-e-ma, to^!o, @\;has to \be d?estroyed.  V oice 2 In t[he#@ final analys,=(is,] stars are created by t?%-he need we have for them, and n+ot by, their talen:t or lack of talen  t or even );%by the_ !fi(^lm i,ndust;.ry or advertising. ^#Miserable nee!%d, dismal,/@] anonymo@us life tha. t @  would like to ex-@pa-\_ nd i]  tse lf to the dime+nsions# of/\ cine ma li*f #]e. The %;imagi *nary life on the screen)# ^ is- the pro;;duct o+f this real need. The star is t\*;he pro je[ction of this nee d. #( The im%ages of  the adve[r+tisem[`?]ent@s, dur*]ing the in;termission/s are mo- re^ su;+ited ,$ than -*%any others  =_for evoking an in=termission of, l%ife.  To %/really d esc`/ribe this *era it woul]** d no doubt be necessary t__@ o show many other[ things. But what would *be the po/i^nt  Better to grasp the totality o=f what has been done and what re*+main=s= to be d-^!one than to *@add more ruins to t(,)he old world o^f%  ??the )spectacle #and ^of memories+% .?   #@1. This film, :#^!whic`=h ev$)[okes the lettrist e*[_xperienc!e\:#s at)^)= the^(, o/rigin of the situationist moveme))nt, _`opens with shots of the Paris [ district frequ+ ented by the lettrists in the e*arly,) 1950s.